![]() ![]() With the new lineup, the JPEGmini Pro standalone app is available for $59, while the JPEGmini Pro Suite costs $89. In an attempt to simplify its product lineup, JPEGmini is including the Capture One 12 plug-in as part of a new Pro Suite solution that also includes the JPEGmini standalone app, Lightroom plug-in and Photoshop extension. JPEGmini doesn’t give a specific amount of size difference it expects its plug-in to make, but in our tests using full-size JPEGs captured with an EOS R and exported from Capture One 12, we saw a final image that was nearly a 25% the size of a standard JPEG saved with Capture One 12 (30MB files down to 7-8MB files). Like its Lightroom plugin, the plug-in allows you to export images from Capture One 12 with JPEGmini’s compression applied using Capture One’s Publish menu (or via the ‘Open With’ action). Now, the JPEG compression program JPEGmini is making the most of the new plug-in support with a new Capture One version of its technology. ![]() Go ahead in dev tools and change url('img/header_background3.png') to img/header_background.png, and img/header_background2.png to see and example.Late last year, Phase One announced an update to its Capture One image processing software that, amongst other features and tools, added the ability to use third-party plug-ins on both the macOS and Windows versions. Here's a little test site I put together for this: Please somebody step in and let me know if I am wrong. So my guess is that horizontally repeating pattern type images are acting unstable in modern mobile browsers, probably because of some strange zoom/ppi related stuff, and the safest bet is to create a mobile version of these type images which are larger than you need and just clips off the side. I then reverted back to the original 6x157px and guess what, it's still janked. I further tried bumping up the image again in photoshop to 4000x157px and it displayed the same, all good. This produced the desired result, a horizontally repeating background image at the same "zoom" as the desktop mode. The height of the bar is set manually to 157. In the end the only way to get a reproducible product of the original was to take my 6x157px image and tile it in PS to be 1920x157px. Well I tried a lot of different combinations of viewports, background sizes, repeats, positioning, etc. I haven't tested with the Note but I presume that WebKit guidance will apply there as well. I feel your pain, but image generation tools help - all the photo manipulation software packages are equipped to do that. So, you need to create different images for different resolutions and serving with media queries, unless you want to waste your user's bandwidth. And, even if you scale your viewport to the device width, any banner image you have that is 800px is still going to upscaled to 1600px - and there's your blurriness. but if they didn't fudge their numbers a wee bit, a respectable 800px-wide website would only take up half the screen on a ~1600px-wide iPad. The issue is that they wanted to their devices to boast an amazing resolution capability to make images pop. It's a pretty annoying problem that reared its head when Apple released that awesome retina display. My tablet has more pixels than my desktop monitor and my high-def tv. Your device actually has way more pixels than it advertises. I’m ill attaching an image for reference. ![]() ![]() Is this possibly a Bootstrap thing or is the area just too small for this sort of patterned background? What confuses me the most is that the DOM level img is just as blurry even though it should just be displaying actual size (I’m not scaling it up or down with %s or anything). I have tried setting the viewport, playing with background repeat and background size, and nothing seems to work. On desktop these look completely fine but when I view them on my Note 3 (1080p screen) both the patterned bg images and the static image on the header are going very blurry to the point where the pattern is lost and it looks like a mess. On the navbar there is a normal block level DOM image. I am also using a similar repeated patterned background image later on the body. I have a fixed pos nav bar at the top of the page with a simple 7x157px img set as the background. We are building a responsive site on Bootstrap. EDIT: This actually appears to be a bug with the mobile version of Chrome! In all other mobile and desktop browsers the repeated bg image displays completely normal. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |